By Todd Wilkinson EBS ENVIRONMENTAL COLUMNIST
Most Americans are probably unfamiliar
with the federal government’s taxpayer-subsidized killing campaign carried out
every year against public wildlife on public lands, most of them located in the
West.
Most are likely unaware that their
hard-earned money, paid in taxes to Uncle Sam, helps to operate a federal
agency known as Wildlife Services, a branch of the U.S. Department of
Agriculture. One of Wildlife Service’s primary missions is functioning
essentially as a protection hit squad for privately owned cattle and sheep
producers allowed to graze their animals on public land grass at rates that
haven’t risen in over half a century.
While most citizens are outraged when
they learn what Wildlife Services does, they are furious when they discover
that one of the weapons Wildlife Services and its state affiliates use to wipe
landscapes free of predators is ultra-lethal cyanide “bombs” known as “M-44s”
that could also kill a human or pet if they came in contact with them.
In fact, a teenage boy from Pocatello,
Idaho, nearly died a few winters ago after he and his pet dog wandered into an
M-44 placed by a Wildlife Services trapper near their suburban home. The dog
bumbled into the M-44, got a dose of cyanide sprayed in its face and then died,
foaming at the mouth, in the boys’ arms.
The same year, two pet dogs were
killed by M-44s outside Cheyenne, Wyoming, the state capital. That prompted
Brooks Fahy, founder of Predator Defense, along with several other wildlife
conservation and animal rights groups representing millions of members, to
again seek a nationwide ban on using M-44s.
In 2017, U.S. Rep. Peter DeFazio of
Oregon, a Democrat, drafted a bill that would do just that, but it got nowhere
when Republicans held a majority in the House of Representatives. Today,
Democrats are in charge in the House and DeFazio’s bill has gained momentum.
Wildlife Services has been under
intense public scrutiny for decades, taken to task for the death tolls of
animals it proudly notches, the accidental killing of “non-target species”
including imperiled wildlife, the deaths of pets, and several close calls
involving outdoor recreationists and dogs who happened upon M-44s and traps.
Few Americans realize that Wildlife
Service agents still use fixed-wing aircraft and helicopters to fly over vast
swaths of the West gunning down coyotes so that ranchers on public lands don’t
have to contend with them at calving and lambing time.
Meanwhile, on the ground, agents lay
down a lethal gauntlet of traps and snares, “fumigants” and sometimes even pour
gasoline down the dens of unwanted predators and then set them alight, burning
alive not only adult animals but also their pups.
For a long while, Wildlife Services
dodged accountability and transparency, refusing to divulge public records
about its activities knowing that it always had lawmakers from the West who
would defend it.
Last year in Wyoming, Wildlife
Services claimed official responsibility for killing 6,231 coyotes, 51 wolves,
148 red foxes and other animals, though many believe that’s a grossly low
estimate. It also doesn’t include the fact that wolves, given their
controversial “predator status,” can be killed in roughly four-fifths of the
state 24 hours a day, 365 days a year by any means—even techniques that animal
welfare experts would claim to be torturous—no questions asked. Notably,
coyotes are treated with even less regard.
All of these relates to an
ecologically illiterate mindset that begins and ends with Wildlife Services and
its allies. The Wyoming Game and Fish Department, which claims to be guided by
best modern practices in professionally stewarding wildlife, turns a blind eye
when it comes to the deeds of Wildlife Services.
Why? Out of fear it will alienate
state lawmakers who fund it.
Game and Fish and members of its
governing wildlife commission seem to condone the practice of running down
coyotes with snowmobiles, which has been widely condemned by leading hunters’
organization as barbaric and unethical. Still, Game and Fish and its
commissioners are afraid to speak out, even on principle.
This week in Wyoming, a state where a
wide range of horrors have been documented since the 1960s, including
snowmobilers running down coyotes with their sleds “for sport,” a court
settlement has struck a blow against Wildlife Service’s use of M-44s.
Under the agreement, Wildlife Services, in addition to
temporarily prohibiting M-44s, must provide by Jan. 8, 2021 an environmental
analysis of the effects and risks of its wildlife-killing program in Wyoming.
In the wake of a wide array of challenges brought against
Wildlife Service’s tactics, field personnel working for the agency also can no
longer set neck snares and traps in places where grizzlies are known to live.
“It’s past time for the government to stop killing predators for
the sake of the livestock industry,” said Erik Molvar, executive director of
Western Watersheds Project. “While the settlement is a temporary reprieve for
native wildlife, we hope that taking a hard look at the program will reveal the
ineffective and dangerous aspects of these activities, resulting in permanent
protections.”
Wildlife Services did not respond to requests for comment for
this column.
Todd Wilkinson is the founder of Bozeman-based “Mountain Journal” and is a correspondent for “National Geographic.” He’s also the author of “Grizzlies of Pilgrim Creek” about famous Jackson Hole grizzly bear 399, which is available at mangelsen.com/grizzly.
